Please follow us on Telegram to be sure to receive our latest posts!
Photo – Foto-Rabe – pixabay.com
Recently, the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has caused controversy over its aims to roll back Obama-era policies that aimed to limit environmental pollution. The president’s critics believe that his policies – including increasing the use of coal, relaxing air pollution standards, and cutting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – would make the air Americans breathe poorer quality air.  Is it worth sacrificing the public health for the sake of money?
The general direction of Trump’s environmental policies is clearly not to clean up the air. However, we are not just talking about a few sore throats here. It actually poses a surprising threat to the lives of Americans who continue to face the problem of long-term exposure to airborne fine particulate matter and ozone, according to a new study carried out by the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. The study revealed that 97% of 60 million Americans age 65 and older are facing an increased risk of premature death, even when the exposure is lower than the EPA’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQ). 
The government wants to loosen air pollution controls, but the study shows that even existing rules are contributors to the tens of thousands of deaths annually. The study investigated twelve years of data from 61 million beneficiaries of Medicare. They also considered a databank of pollution readings to determine the association between specific air quality levels and death rates.
The major findings of the study are summarized below:
• Death rate increased 7.3 percent for every increase of just 10 micrograms in small-particle pollution known as PM2.5.
• The increase above equates with 120,000 fatalities among people age 65 and older.
• A 10 part-per-billion rise in ozone concentration is equivalent to a 1.1 percent in mortality rate.
• Lowering the level of PM2.5 by one microgram per cubic meter translates to about 12,000 lives saved every year.
• Lowering the level of ozone by just one part per billion could save about 1,900 lives each year.
According to Francesca Dominici, lead author of the study, their research highlights the link between reducing the NAAQ limits for fine particulate matter and producing important public health benefits. She posits the relevance of their findings to self-identified racial minorities and people with low-incomes. These demographics are three times as likely to die from exposure to fine particulate matters, the study found.
California suffers the most health impacts attributed to air pollution, according to a study conducted by researchers at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Emissions from road transportation were the most significant contributor. Other risk factors include power generation, industrial activity, commercial and residential sources, and rail transportation. 
Air pollution is one of the leading global risk factors for disease, according to a study presented at the 2016 meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Despite tougher efforts to slow emissions, air pollution will continue to rise in the coming decades, based on the number of deaths tied to air pollution. 
The U.S. is not only the country that experienced increases in pollution deaths in recent decades – and is nowhere near the worst. China and India account for more than half of the deaths related to air pollution. Brazil, Japan, and Pakistan also bear the brunt of air pollution to their population. However it’s a sad truth that global consumerism drives these countries’ industrial expansion, and they too have placed profit as a higher consideration than public health.
One study estimated that outdoor air pollution would cause the deaths of three million people by 2050.  Another study attributed the premature deaths of 1.6 million people in China to air pollution. 
The vast majority of air pollution deaths are due to cardiovascular diseases, according to a 2014 report from the World Health Organization. These diseases include stroke and ischaemic heart disease. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and acute lower respiratory infections are the air pollution-caused deaths. 
The Harvard study suggests that the present EPA standards may not be stringent enough to reduce air pollution. It stresses the need for the U.S. to double its commitment to clean air. It criticizes the Trump government for moving headlong in the opposite direction which includes funding cuts to EPA and undoing rules regulating power plant emissions. It calls for lowering pollution levels even further.
 Michael Greshko, Laura Parker, and Brian Clark Howard. June 14, 2017. National Geographic. A Running List of How Trump Is Changing the Environment. https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/03/how-trump-is-changing-science-environment/
 Qian D. et al. June 29, 2017. The New England Journal of Medicine. Air Pollution and Mortality in the Medicare Population. https://nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1702747
 Caiazzo F et al. November 2013. Atmospheric Environment. Air pollution and early deaths in the United States. Part I: Quantifying the impact of major sectors in 2005. https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231013004548
 Justin Worland. February 12, 2016. Air Pollution Kills More Than 5 Million People Around the World Every Year. https://time.com/4219575/air-pollution-deaths/
 J. Lelieveld J. et al. September 17, 2015. Nature. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. https://nature.com/nature/journal/v525/n7569/full/nature15371.html?foxtrotcallback=true
 Robert A. Rohde and Richard A. Muller. Berkley Earth. Air Pollution in China: Mapping of Concentrations and Sources. https://berkeleyearth.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/China-Air-Quality-Paper-July-2015.pdf
 World Health Organization. March 25, 2014. 7 million premature deaths annually linked to air pollution. https://who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/air-pollution/en/
😳 What Tinnitus Does To Your Brain Cells (And How To Stop It)
After 47 years of studies and countless brain scans done on more than 2,400 tinnitus patients, scientists at the MIT Institute found that in a shocking 96% of cases, tinnitus was actually shrinking their brain cells.
As it turns out, tinnitus and brain health are strongly linked.
Even more interesting: The reason why top army officials are not deaf after decades of hearing machine guns, bombs going off and helicopter noises…
Is because they are using something called "the wire method", a simple protocol inspired by a classified surgery on deaf people from the 1950s...
★ How To Get Rid Of Nail Fungus:
★ 20 Natural Painkillers In Your Kitchen (Video):
2. Famous Chef Sheds 60lbs Researching New Paleo Recipes: Get The Cookbook FREE Here
3. #1 muscle that eliminates joint and back pain, anxiety and looking fat
4. 7 odd foods that KILL your abdominal fat (surprising fat-fighters)
5. The TRUTH about bread (Will surprise you!)
6. [PROOF] Reverse Diabetes with a "Pancreas Jumpstart"
7. Here's What Happens When You "Unlock Your Hip Flexors"
8. The #1 WORST food that CAUSES Faster Aging (beware -- Are you eating this?)
The #1 Muscle That Eliminates Joint And Back Pain, Anxiety And Looking Fat
By Mike Westerdal CPT
Can you guess which muscle in your body is the #1 muscle that eliminates joint and back pain, anxiety and looking fat?
This is especially important if you spend a significant amount of time sitting every day (I do, and this really affects me in a big way!)
Working this "hidden survival muscle" that most people are simply not training because no-one ever taught them how will boost your body shape, energy levels, immune system, sexual function, strength and athletic performance when unlocked.
If this "hidden" most powerful primal muscle is healthy, we are healthy.
d) Hip Flexors
Take the quiz above and see if you got the correct answer!
P.S. Make sure you check out this page to get to know the 10 simple moves that will bring vitality back into your life:
If you enjoyed this page: